SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
Comments Off on SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
Read the rest of SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg Post tags: “sustainable architecture” , eco design , eco tower , green architecture , Green Building , green design , green tower , mixed-use development , Singapore , Skidmore Owings & Merrill , SOM , Sustainable Building , sustainable design , sustainable tower , tanjong pagar centre , tanjong pagar tower , tanjong papar city park
Read more from the original source:
SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
Comments Off on SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
Read the rest of SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg Post tags: “sustainable architecture” , eco design , eco tower , green architecture , Green Building , green design , green tower , mixed-use development , Singapore , Skidmore Owings & Merrill , SOM , Sustainable Building , sustainable design , sustainable tower , tanjong pagar centre , tanjong pagar tower , tanjong papar city park
Read the original here:Â
SOM’s Tanjong Pagar Centre Will Be the Tallest Building in Singapore
Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer
Comments Off on Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer
Farming will never be the same after the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Monsanto in a seed patenting case against an Indiana farmer that some had hoped would break the company’s monopoly on modern agriculture. Monsanto sued Vernon Bowman after he purchased their Roundup Ready Soybeans from a grain elevator to plant a late second crop, The Guardian reports . Bowman argued that the patent was exhausted since he bought the seeds from a third party, but the corporate giant said he had agreed not to save any of the harvest for replanting when he entered into a contract to purchase their seeds. Justice Elena Kagan agreed that patent exhaustion did not apply in this case and the court ordered Bowman to pay $84,456. Read the rest of Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg Post tags: Environment , farming , genetically modified organisms , GMO , Indiana farmer , Indiana Farmer loses to Monsanto , Monsanto , News , patent exhaustion , roundup ready , Supreme Court agriculture case , US seed patenting
The rest is here:Â
Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer
Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer
Comments Off on Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer
Farming will never be the same after the United States Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Monsanto in a seed patenting case against an Indiana farmer that some had hoped would break the company’s monopoly on modern agriculture. Monsanto sued Vernon Bowman after he purchased their Roundup Ready Soybeans from a grain elevator to plant a late second crop, The Guardian reports . Bowman argued that the patent was exhausted since he bought the seeds from a third party, but the corporate giant said he had agreed not to save any of the harvest for replanting when he entered into a contract to purchase their seeds. Justice Elena Kagan agreed that patent exhaustion did not apply in this case and the court ordered Bowman to pay $84,456. Read the rest of Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer Permalink | Add to del.icio.us | digg Post tags: Environment , farming , genetically modified organisms , GMO , Indiana farmer , Indiana Farmer loses to Monsanto , Monsanto , News , patent exhaustion , roundup ready , Supreme Court agriculture case , US seed patenting
See the original post here:Â
Monsanto Wins $84,456 in US Supreme Court Case Against an Indiana Farmer